THREAT HUNTERRISK INTELLIGENCE

Product Platform · Private Deployment

API Security Platform

Connect asset discovery, defect review, remediation and retesting in one operational view instead of relying on periodic inventories.

Continuously discover changing API assets, map sensitive-data flows and identify interface defects from mirrored traffic.

Talk to our team Explore solutions

Customer problem

When internal signals do not explain the full external risk

Continuously discover changing API assets, map sensitive-data flows and identify interface defects from mirrored traffic.

01

API inventories become outdated quickly

Legacy, shadow and frequently changing interfaces can escape periodic asset reviews.

02

Sensitive-data paths are difficult to trace

Teams need current traffic context to understand where sensitive fields are exposed or over-accessed.

03

Findings lose ownership after discovery

Defects require a clear owner, remediation status and retest record to become a sustained governance process.

A continuously changing API inventoryCAPABILITY MAP

API assets change as services, versions, exposure and ownership evolve, so the inventory requires continuous governance.

  1. 01
    Business groupingOrganize APIs around products and operating domains
  2. 02
    API typeUnderstand internal, external and third-party exposure
  3. 03
    State changeTrack new, versioned, shadow and deprecated APIs
  4. 04
    Continuous governanceMaintain ownership, status and review history
The abstract inventory does not represent a real customer asset list or guaranteed discovery coverage.

Customer value

Connect asset discovery, defect review, remediation and retesting in one operational view instead of relying on periodic inventories.

Outputs are designed to make the signal explainable, reviewable and usable in an existing customer workflow.

01

Dynamic API and sensitive-data inventories

Dynamic API and sensitive-data inventories, organized so the responsible team can review the rationale and continue the workflow.

02

Defect findings with request context and rationale

Defect findings with request context and rationale, organized so the responsible team can review the rationale and continue the workflow.

03

Ownership, remediation, retest and governance records

Ownership, remediation, retest and governance records, organized so the responsible team can review the rationale and continue the workflow.

API and sensitive-data risk viewCAPABILITY MAP

A high-level matrix connects API groups with data categories, exposure context and items requiring review.

  1. 01
    API groupThe business and service context
  2. 02
    Sensitive-data typeThe high-level data category involved
  3. 03
    Data-bearing scopeWhere the API may carry or expose the category
  4. 04
    Risk contextRelevant weakness or exposure explanation
  5. 05
    Review queueItems requiring customer verification
Blank cells do not mean safe, and the diagram contains no real fields, payloads, scores or compliance conclusions.

Use cases

Where this offering fits

Use the actual workflow, market and risk objective to confirm scope before deployment or engagement.

Scenario 01

Shadow, legacy and undocumented API discovery

Use API Security Platform when your team needs external context, clear evidence and a defined next step for shadow, legacy and undocumented API discovery.

Scenario 02

Sensitive-data exposure and excessive access

Use API Security Platform when your team needs external context, clear evidence and a defined next step for sensitive-data exposure and excessive access.

Scenario 03

Identity, authorization and business-logic defects

Use API Security Platform when your team needs external context, clear evidence and a defined next step for identity, authorization and business-logic defects.

Decision and action

From a defined scope to a usable result

The operating path changes by delivery model, while authorization, evidence and customer ownership remain explicit.

  1. 01

    Confirm the operating scope

    Define the business objects, external risks and users that belong in the platform scope.

  2. 02

    Collect and organize signals

    Continuously turn relevant external observations into traceable events and context.

  3. 03

    Review and prioritize

    Use evidence, relationships and business context to decide what requires customer verification.

  4. 04

    Act and keep tracking

    Move confirmed findings into the appropriate workflow and continue observing material changes.

From weakness explanation to remediation reviewCAPABILITY MAP

The platform explains risk and recommendations; the customer owns remediation and the final operating decision.

  1. 01
    Platform explainsClassify the weakness and describe business impact
  2. 02
    Customer evaluatesConfirm relevance, ownership and remediation priority
  3. 03
    Customer remediatesImplement the selected design or control change
  4. 04
    Track and retestVerify the agreed scope after remediation
  5. 05
    Operational reviewFeed recurring findings into governance
Business-risk analysis is used when agreed, and the platform does not claim automatic blocking, repair or compliance.

What the team receives

Outputs for review and follow-up

  1. 01

    Dynamic API and sensitive-data inventories

  2. 02

    Defect findings with request context and rationale

  3. 03

    Ownership, remediation, retest and governance records

Start with the business risk

Explore where API Security Platform can help.

Tell us about the workflow, target market and risk objective. We will confirm the suitable delivery scope and next step.

Talk to our team